Should You Answer A Sample Essay Or An Original Essay?

Should You Answer A Sample Essay Or An Original Essay?A lot of folks get a little nervous when they hear about the IB History HL Paper or HL in History. A sample essay, you say?Well, yes. There is just one little hitch, which is more an etiquette than a law. The question that should be asked here is: Should you answer a sample essay and then answer an original essay?The answer is yes. And if you are ever asked to do the latter, you will know why. Here is what you can expect. If you write a sample essay, you will get a test in which you have already answered the questions on the sample paper and this means that you understand them and they mean nothing to you.On the other hand, writing an original essay, and not a sample essay, means that you are faced with a test. You do not know what they are going to ask you. This means that you will have to go and think out the answers. This will be extremely helpful to you as it means that you will have something fresh to write.You might also wan t to consider that if you choose to write a sample essay, it is bound to happen, and will probably happen more often than not. You will be surrounded by your fellow classmates and they will be anxious to help you out. They will share ideas and answer your questions. A good idea is to ask questions of your fellow classmates before you start writing.On the other hand, if you chose to write an original essay, and this will happen more often than not, you will not have the opportunity to do this. Again, you are alone, and this is precisely why you need to set up a schedule for this, or at least a system, that you are comfortable with and that you know works.A second thing to consider, and this is important, is that if you have to write an original essay, you should always have a look at the sample and correct any mistakes you find. If you get stuck, do not get discouraged. Just look around for an answer.

Apartheid In Africa Essays - Apartheid In South Africa,

Apartheid In Africa Apartheid was a long shadow in the history of South Africa. Nelson Mandela is one of the great moral and political leaders of our time: an international hero whose lifelong dedication to the fight against racial oppression in South Africa won him the Nobel Peace Prize and the presidency of his country. Since his triumphant release in 1990 from more than a quarter-century of imprisonment, Mandela has been at the center of the most compelling and inspiring political drama in the world. As president of the African National Congress and head of South Africa's anti-apartheid movement, he was instrumental in moving the nation toward multiracial government and majority rule. He is revered everywhere as a vital force in the fight for human rights and racial equality. The election of Nelson Mandela in 1994 marked the first time all race elections were held in South Africa and the end of all white rule in South Africa. Prior to 1994, only white people held political control with the majority of people living in South Africa having little to no real representation in government. One word described the racist system that kept non-whites from political and social equality and became infamously known around the world: Apartheid. Apartheid was not a case of just "I am white and I don't like blacks." It was a complex system of social separation - called segregation under British rule. It was a system of cheap labor enforced by laws, social, and industrial practices. There was also an ideology that justified it; whatever one did to question it, there was the pre-existing attitude "we are civilized and they are not." In 1910 the British parliament passed the Act of Union that brought British and Afrikaans colonies together to create a united and independent South Africa. Unfortunately, the newly created country did not break from a tradition of discrimination and segregation. Instead these practices became even further entrenched as bills were passed to ensure white domination. However, it wasn't until 1948 and the election of Dr. D.F. Malan's Nationalist Party that the concepts of apartheid became officially government policy (Moodie, 1994, p12). Malan was victorious in the election, beating the United Party and its leader Jan Smuts by portraying Smuts and his party as too liberal and not capable of dealing with the swart gevar (Afrikaans for "black peril"). In a country controlled by a white minority, fear tactics worked for the Nationalists, and they managed a slender parliamentary majority. From 1948 on, official apartheid principles were put into practical effect, and Malan's government passed bills designed to maintain political, economic, and social control by whites over non-whites (Robinson, 1968, p.87). Under apartheid, people were classified into one of four categories: White, Colored, Indian, and Black. As a non-white, one was required to carry a passbook that detailed one's racial grouping, employer, place of dwelling, and permission to be (on a temporary basis only) in a white area. In 1954 the Resettlement of Natives Act meant that entire towns and villages in which "non-whites" lived were suddenly designated to be "white-only" areas. The entire population would then be forced to resettle into "tribal reserves." As well, Blacks not needed for labor in white communities (referred to as "superfluous Bantu" by the nationalist government) were sent to live in these homelands. During the 1960's, nearly three million Africans were moved onto the Bantustans (Porter, 1991, p.32). Blacks would be removed from their homes, trucked to their new homeland, and dumped on land with little or no agricultural value and no infrastructure. The result was mass starvation and major epidemics. In an effort to give credibility to the reserves, the 1953 Nationalist government passed the Bantu Authorities Act allowing Bantustans to become "independent" homelands. In reality, however, Bantustans proved to be nothing more than holding areas for cheap labor for the white economy (Report of the Select Committee on the Immorality Amendment Bill, 1968, p. 9). Meanwhile charges of racism were coming from both inside South Africa and around the world. Oliver Tambo, a leading political activist against apartheid and president of the African National Congress (ANC), outlines what it meant to be a non-white living in apartheid South Africa in his paper Human Right in South Africa: During the last two decades human values in our country sank to primitive levels as elementary human rights were trampled underfoot on a scale unparalleled in recent history. This occurred in open and direct defiance of the United Nations and the entire international community. It is as well to remember that the men in